You are here
Human placenta-derived cells (PDA-001) for the treatment of adults with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Infusion of PDA-001, a preparation of mesenchymal-like cells derived from full-term human placenta, is a new approach in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis.
This safety study aimed to rule out the possibility of paradoxical exacerbation of disease activity by PDA-001 in patients with multiple sclerosis.
This was a phase 1b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-dose ranging study including patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The study was conducted at 6 sites in the United States and 2 sites in Canada. Patients were randomized 3:1 to receive 2 low-dose infusions of PDA-001 (150×106cells) or placebo, given 1 week apart. After completing this cohort, subsequent patients received high-dose PDA-001 (600×106cells) or placebo. Monthly brain magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed. The primary end point was ruling out the possibility of paradoxical worsening of MS disease activity. This was monitored using Cutter׳s rule (≥5 new gadolinium lesions on 2 consecutive scans) by brain magnetic resonance imaging on a monthly basis for six months and also the frequency of multiple sclerosis relapse.
Ten patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and 6 with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned to treatment: 6 to low-dose PDA-001, 6 to high-dose PDA-001, and 4 to placebo. No patient met Cutter׳s rule. One patient receiving high-dose PDA-001 had an increase in T2 and gadolinium lesions and in Expanded Disability Status Scale score during a multiple sclerosis flare 5 months after receiving PDA-001. No other patient had an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale score >0.5, and most had stable or decreasing Expanded Disability Status Scale scores. With high-dose PDA-001, 1 patient experienced a grade 1 anaphylactoid reaction and 1 had grade 2 superficial thrombophlebitis. Other adverse events were mild to moderate and included headache, fatigue, infusion site reactions, and urinary tract infection.
PDA-001 infusions were safe and well tolerated in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients. No paradoxical worsening of lesion counts was noted with either dose.
- Preclinical models suggest mesenchymal stromal cells may lead to immunomodulation and repair in MS.
- A dose escalating, placebo controlled study of PDA-001 was conducted in patients with MS.
- PDA-001 infusion appears to be safe and well tolerated in patients with MS.
- No paradoxical worsening of MS lesion counts was noted.
Keywords: Cell therapy, Clinical trial, Immunomodulators, Multiple sclerosis, Mesenchymal stromal cells.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immunologically mediated disease of the central nervous system that is prevalent worldwide (Bradley, 2008, Pugliatti et al, 2006, and Rosati, 2001). The disease may occur at any age, but onset is most frequent in adults aged 20 to 50 years. MS usually begins as a relapsing, episodic disorder, known as relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), and for many evolves into a chronic condition characterized by progressive neurologic disability, known as secondary progressive MS (SPMS) (Lublin and Reingold, 1996 and Riddell et al, 2011). Several therapies, including biologic agents and immunomodulators, can reduce the relapse rate and formation of new lesions, but no standard therapy is curative (Compston and Coles, 2008 and Lublin and Reingold, 1996). No MS therapy to date has shown any significant ability to improve functioning in patients with fixed disability.
Mesenchymal stromal cell-based infusion has the potential to influence both immunomodulation and repair (Darlington et al, 2011, Martino et al, 2010, and Nauta and Fibbe, 2007). PDA-001 (cenplacel-L) is a preparation of mesenchymal-like cells derived from healthy, full-term human placental tissue for administration to patients via intravenous infusion ( Mayer et al., 2013 ). The cells display immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, pro-regenerative, neuroprotective, and angiogenic properties in preclinical models of neuropathic pain, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and ischemic stroke (He et al, 2013, Liu et al, 2014, and Shehadah et al, 2014). Cultures are expanded as a plastic-adherent, undifferentiated in vitro cell population that expresses the nominal phenotype CD34-, CD10+, CD105+, and CD200+. The cells constitutively express moderate levels of human leukocyte antigen class I and undetectable levels of human leukocyte antigen class II, and do not express the co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86. Cells are genetically stable, displaying a normal diploid chromosome count and normal karyotype, and exhibit normal senescence after prolonged in vitro culture.
In the mouse model for human MS (EAE), administration of PDA-001 exhibits dose-dependent protection from EAE induction and, in established EAE, reduced disease progression and disease severity ( Liu et al., 2014 ). No evidence of a paradoxical worsening was observed with PDA-001, suggesting a low probability that this effect would occur in MS patients. This needs to be confirmed in patients prior to the start of large, Phase II trials. This safety study aimed to rule out the possibility of paradoxical exacerbation of disease activity by PDA-001 in patients with multiple sclerosis. Although not powered for statistical significance, we also looked at preliminary clinical outcome measures. Dose levels selected for the study were based on safety and efficacy considerations using weight scaling from doses used in the murine EAE model.
Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with a pre-existing diagnosis of RRMS or SPMS per the 2005 McDonald Criteria ( Polman et al., 2005 ) and disease duration of at least 2 years were eligible to participate in the study. Patients had to have evidence of active disease as evidenced by clinical progression, continued relapses, or worsening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans after at least 1 year of attempted therapy. The MRI worsening is evidenced by an increase of at least 1 point in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (if screening EDSS was ≤5.0) or 0.5 EDSS score (if baseline EDSS was ≥5.5). Patients were excluded if they were treated with systemic immunosuppressive medications (eg, infliximab, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, azathioprine, methotrexate, linomide, cyclosporine, cladribine, deoxyspergualin) or natalizumab within 6 months before screening. Adequate cardiac, pulmonary, liver, and renal function was required. All patients gave written informed consent before enrollment.
2.2. Study design
This phase 1b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-dose escalation study was conducted from November 2010 to August 2011 at 6 sites in the United States and 2 sites in Canada under an Investigational New Drug license from the US Food and Drug Administration and a Clinical Trial Application from Health Canada. The study protocol was approved by local institutional review boards. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of Good Clinical Practice, as required by independent regulatory authorities and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
The study sequentially evaluated 2 dosage levels of PDA-001 versus placebo, administered by intravenous infusion. The low-dose (1 unit; 150×106cells) PDA-001 group was enrolled and dosed first; after day 36 evaluation, the Data Monitoring Committee recommended enrollment of the high-dose (4 units; 600×106cells) PDA-001 group. Each dose level cohort consisted of 8 patients, 6 randomized to receive PDA-001 and 2 randomized to receive placebo. A pretreatment screening phase of up to 35 days was followed by an 8-day treatment phase (infusion of PDA-001 or placebo on days 0 and 7), and an initial follow-up phase of 6 months plus an extended follow-up period of 6 months. Patients were followed for the full 12 months regardless of clinical response.
The primary end point was ruling out the possibility of paradoxical worsening of MS disease activity. This was monitored using Cutter׳s rule (≥5 new gadolinium lesions on 2 consecutive scans) by brain magnetic resonance imaging on a monthly basis for six months and also the frequency of multiple sclerosis relapse. Secondary end points included changes in MS-related disability and quality of life.
Patients were assigned to a dose level cohort (8 patients per cohort) based on the order of entry into the study. Using a randomization code generated by an independent statistician, patients were randomly allocated 1:3 to receive low-dose PDA-001, high-dose PDA-001, or placebo and stratified by type of MS (RRMS or SPMS). Treatment was double-blinded, with all patients receiving numbered drug infusion bags that were identical in appearance. All patients and investigators, excluding the pharmacist at each study site, the independent statistician and the independent data monitoring committee, were masked to treatment allocation during the study.
During the screening period, patients were evaluated for study eligibility. Baseline cranial MRI scans were obtained within 14 days before all patients received their initial dose in the treatment phase. PDA-001 and placebo units were supplied in a cryopreserved state. Immediately before administration, units were thawed, reconstituted with sufficient diluent (infusion grade dextran 40) for a total of 240 mL per infusion, and transferred to an infusion bag through the port using sterile technique. Each PDA-001 unit contained approximately 150×106cells. Placebo contained all of the excipients and at the same concentrations as the PDA-001 product, but did not contain the PDA-001 cells.
On study days 0 and 7 of the treatment phase, the first 8 eligible patients (low-dose PDA-001 group) received infusions of 150×106cells or placebo, and then the next 8 eligible patients (high-dose PDA-001 group) received 2 infusions of 600×106cells or placebo. Infusion occurred over 2 h via a 20- to 22-gauge catheter connected to a volumetric infusion pump and had to be completed within 4 h of thaw start time. Diphenhydramine 50 mg and hydrocortisone 50 mg were given as premedications 15 to 30 min before each infusion. Patients׳ heart rate, respiration, blood pressure, body temperature and blood oxygen saturation were monitored every 15 min during the infusion and for at least 2 h after the end of the infusion. After completing the treatment period, patients entered the initial 6-month follow-up period, during which safety and efficacy data were collected.
Patients received monthly MRI scans for 6 months. MRI data collected during the screening and initial follow-up period were analyzed at a central read facility; this analysis occurred after all patients in the low-dose and high-dose groups completed the initial follow-up period. The extended follow-up period (6 months) allowed for collection of long-term safety data and additional efficacy observations and quality-of-life information. Concomitant MS medications were maintained at a constant dose as long as possible throughout the study.
Data from MRI scans were utilized in the analysis of safety and efficacy end points. MRI data were used to assess the severity of clinical disease by evaluating change in the number of brain MS lesions at 6 months compared with baseline. The safety evaluation included an on-going review of clinical laboratory tests, including blood and urine; neurological and physical examinations, including vital sign measurements; electrocardiograms; MRI or computed tomography scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis; use of concomitant medications; and incidence and severity of infusion reactions and adverse events.
The independent data monitoring committee reviewed all safety information to ensure patient safety and determined study continuation and/or modifications. Lesion counts, as determined by local assessment of MRI scans, were provided to the data monitoring committee. These local readings were superseded by the central readings for the final data analysis. The committee was convened upon completion of dosing and month 1 MRI assessments for the low-dose group to review safety information and cranial lesion counts before continuing enrollment into the high-dose group. When a negative safety signal or paradoxical effect was identified, as defined by Cutter׳s rule (development of ≥5 new lesions present on 2 consecutive monthly scans) ( Riddell et al., 2011 ), or ≥2 patients experienced a grade 2 or greater allergic reaction, an unexpected treatment-related adverse event or dose-limiting toxicity within 28 days of the initial treatment dose. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 2 toxicity not resolving within 14 days or grade 3 or greater toxicity at least possibly related to treatment.
The MRI effect was determined by evaluating the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions over 6 months versus placebo. Changes in clinical function and quality of life were evaluated using a standardized definition of relapse, EDSS, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, MS Fatigue Impact Scale, and the MS Quality of Life scale, which were administered at baseline, before each infusion, monthly during the initial follow-up period, and every 3 months during the extended follow-up period.
2.5. Statistical analysis
The study was not powered to measure efficacy. A sample size of 6 patients per group (low-dose and high-dose PDA-001) was selected to provide preliminary information about safety and clinical effect while minimizing the number of patients exposed to PDA-001 if paradoxical worsening of MS occurred. Data were analyzed after all patients in each cohort completed the initial 6-month follow-up period. The safety population consisted of all patients who received any amount of PDA-001 or placebo. Efficacy analyses were performed on a modified intent-to-treat population, defined as all treated patients with at least 1 follow-up MRI scan. Descriptive summaries were provided for the primary and secondary end points, and no formal statistical tests were planned. Continuous, quantitative, variable summaries included the number of subjects, mean, SD, median, minimum, and maximum. Categorical, qualitative, variable summaries included the frequency and percentage of patients in a particular category. All analyses were performed using SAS Software version 9.1 or later (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA).
Sixteen patients were sequentially screened and randomized into 2-dose level cohorts. Six patients were initially assigned low-dose PDA-001 (1 unit) and 2 were assigned placebo. Subsequently, 6 patients were assigned high-dose PDA-001 (4 units) and 2 were assigned placebo ( Fig. 1 ). All 16 patients completed treatment, the initial 6-month follow-up period and the extended 6-month follow-up period. The safety and modified intent-to-treat populations included all 16 enrolled patients. Baseline disease characteristics were generally well balanced, but the proportion of patients with SPMS was highest in the high-dose PDA-001 group ( Table 1 ). The median baseline EDSS score was 5.0 (range 4.0–5.5) in the low-dose group and 6.0 (range 1.5–6.5) in the high-dose group.
|PDA-001||Placebo (n=4)||Total (N=16)|
|Low dose, 1 unit (n=6)||High dose, 4 units (n=6)|
|Age, median (range), y||52.5 (41–58)||47.5 (36–56)||47.5 (40–52)||48.0 (36–58)|
|Men, n (%)||2 (33)||1 (17)||2 (50)||5 (31)|
|White race, n (%)||6 (100)||6 (100)||4 (100)||16 (100)|
|Type of MS, n (%)|
|RRMS||5 (83)||2 (33)||3 (75)||10 (62.5)|
|SPMS||1 (17)||4 (67)||1 (25)||6 (37.5)|
|Time since diagnosis, median (range), y||6.2 (5.2–31.8)||10.8 (1.0–14.7)||11.35 (2.0–26.5)||8.5 (1.0–31.8)|
|Gadolinium-enhancing lesions, median (range)||0 (0–0)||0 (0–1)||0 (0–0)||0 (0–1)|
|EDSS score, median (range)||5.0 (4.0–5.5)||6.0 (1.5–6.5)||4.0 (4.0–4.0)||4.8 (1.5–6.5)|
Abbreviations: EDSS, expanded disability status scale; MS, multiple sclerosis; RRMS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS, secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.
Information on patients׳ previous failed MS medications before the screening period was not formally collected. Thirteen (81%) patients were taking at least 1 MS medication during the screening and study periods ( Table 2 ). Disease-modifying and symptom-controlling MS medications used by 10% or more of patients during the study were interferon beta-1a (38%), baclofen (31%), glatiramer acetate (25%), gabapentin (19%), and fingolimod (13%). Concomitant medication use was similar between the dose groups.
|Patient number||MS Type||Medication||Prior (P) or concomitant (C)||Start date [study day]||End date [study day]||Reason for use|
|PDA-001 (1 unit)|
|003-1001||RRMS||Glatiramer acetate||P, C||2005||Ongoing||MS|
|003-1002||RRMS||Interferon-beta-1 A||P, C||2007||Ongoing||MS|
|Pregabalin||P, C||2008||Ongoing||Neuropathic pain|
|Amitriptyline||P, C||2009||Ongoing||Neuropathic pain|
|003-1004||RRMS||Interferon-beta-1 A||P||2009 [−604]||2010 [−330]||MS|
|Gabapentin||C||||Ongoing||MS leg pain|
|Cyclobenzaprine||C||||||MS leg pain|
|Baclofen||C||||Ongoing||MS leg pain|
|004-1005||RRMS||Fingolimod||P, C||2009 [−495]||Ongoing||RRMS|
|Medical marijuana||P, C||2010 [−216]||Ongoing||Spasticity|
|004-1007||RRMS||Glatiramer acetate||P, C||1998||||RRMS|
|Baclofen||P, C||2010 [−453]||Ongoing||MS leg weakness|
|Tizanidine||P, C||2010 [−307]||Ongoing||MS leg spasticity|
|007-1008||SPMS||Teriflunomide||P||2007 [−1343]||2010 [−168]||MS|
|Amantadine||P, C||2007 [−1385]||Ongoing||MS-related fatigue|
|PDA-001 (4 units)|
|007-2001||SPMS||Natalizumab||P||2009 [−692]||2001 [−184]||MS|
|005-2003||SPMS||Baclofen||P, C||2004 [−2586]||Ongoing||Muscle spasms|
|Gabapentin||P, C||2004 [−2460]||2012 ||Neuropathic pain|
|Interferon-beta-1A||P, C||2005 [−2201]||2011 ||MS|
|Prednisolone||P||2011 [−181]||2011 [−179]||MS relapse|
|Interferon-beta-1A||P, C||2011 [−109]||Ongoing||MS|
|007-2006||SPMS||Amitriptyline||P, C||2011||Ongoing||Muscle spasms|
|Gabapentin||P, C||2011||Ongoing||MS-related pain|
|001-2007||SPMS||Interferon-beta-1A||P, C||2001 [−3,878]||Ongoing||MS|
|Glatiramer acetate||P, C||2008 [−987]||Ongoing||MS|
|Fampridine||P||2010 [−409]||2011 [−89]||Gait disturbance|
|Tizanidine||P||2011 [−147]||2011 [−45]||MS-related spasticity|
|Baclofen||P, C||2011 [−76]||Ongoing||MS-related spasticity|
|004-1006||RRMS||Gabapentin||P, C||2003||Ongoing||MS dysesthesia|
|Glatiramer acetate||P, C||2003||Ongoing||RRMS|
|Modafinil||P, C||2005||Ongoing||MS-related fatigue|
|Vicodin||P, C||2005||Ongoing||MS-related pain|
|Baclofen||P, C||2008 [−938]||Ongoing||MS|
|Prednisolone; high-dose intravenous and taper||P||2011 [−108]||2011 [−99]||MS relapse|
|008-2005||RRMS||Natalizumab||P||2009 [−749]||2010 [−266]||MS|
|Fampridine||P, C||2010 [−263]||Ongoing||Mobility|
|Prednisolone||P||2011 [−195]||2011 [−193]||MS relapse|
|Fingolimod||P, C||2011 [−168]||Ongoing||MS|
Abbreviations: MS, multiple sclerosis; RRMS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS, secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.
The gadolinium-enhancing lesion counts (the primary end point) are shown by month in Fig. 2 . After 6 months of follow-up, no patient met Cutter׳s rule, indicating a lack of paradoxical effect of PDA-001 on MS lesions. Cutter׳s rule required the development of ≥5 new lesions present on 2 consecutive monthly scans. One patient showed an increase in gadolinium-enhancing lesions during an MS flare 5 months after receiving high-dose PDA-001 but did not meet Cutter׳s rule for 2 consecutive scans. This patient also showed an increase in EDSS score during this period ( Fig. 3 ). No other patient had an increase in EDSS score greater than 0.5, and most patients had either stable or decreasing EDSS scores. No trends were seen over time in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, MS Fatigue Impact Scale, or MS Quality of Life scale.
Adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity ( Table 3 ). The most common adverse events (irrespective of relatedness to study treatment) were headache (44%), upper respiratory infection (31%) and nausea, fatigue, gait disturbance, urinary tract infection, and nasopharyngitis (25% each). Infusion-related adverse events (grade 1 or 2) occurred in 2 patients in the low-dose PDA-001 group and in 4 patients in the high-dose PDA-001 group (38%); these included infusion site swelling (19%), hematoma (12%), site mass (13%), or pain (6%). Serious infusion-related events occurred in 2 patients in the high-dose group (grade 1 anaphylactoid reaction and grade 2 superficial thrombophlebitis), both of which resolved without requiring a change in study medication. Only 1 grade 3 adverse event was reported (MS relapse on day 27; duration, 59 days), but this event was not suspected as being related to study therapy. No patient withdrew from the study due to an adverse event, and no deaths were reported.
|Parameter||PDA-001||Placebo (n=4)||Total (N=16)|
|Low dose, 1 unit (n=6)||High dose, 4 units (n=6)|
|Patients with at least 1 AE, n (%)||6 (100)||6 (100)||3 (75)||15 (94)|
|Highest grade AE|
|Mild/grade 1||0 (0)||0 (0)||0 (0)||0 (0)|
|Moderate/grade 2||6 (100)||5 (83)||3 (75)||14 (88)|
|Severe/grade 3||0 (0)||1 (17)||0 (0)||1 (6)|
|Relatedness to study therapy, n (%)|
|Suspected||4 (67)||6 (100)||2 (50)||12 (75)|
|Not suspected||2 (33)||0 (0)||1 (25)||3 (18)|
|AEs suspected as related to study therapy, n (%)||7||17||3||27|
|Grade 1/2/3, n (%)||2/5/0||12/5/0||3/0/0||17/10/0|
|Type of AEs suspected as related to study therapy in ≥2 patients in any group (grade 1/2)|
|Infusion site swelling||1/1||1||0||3|
|Patients with at least 1 SAE||0 (0%)||2 (33%) a||0 (0%)||2 (13%)|
a Grade 1 anaphylactoid reaction (suspected as related to study therapy); grade 2 superficial thrombophlebitis (not suspected as related to study therapy).
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; SAE, serious adverse event.
4.1. Key findings
Infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells or mesenchymal-like cells is a new approach being explored for the treatment of patients with MS and may have immunosuppressive and regenerative potential for damaged neural tissue (Darlington et al, 2011, Keough and Yong, 2013, and Uccelli et al, 2011). PDA-001 infusion appears safe and well tolerated in patients with RRMS and SPMS. At the 2 PDA-001 doses tested (1 unit and 4 units), there was no evidence of a paradoxical worsening of MS lesions. EDSS scores over the 1-year follow-up period were similar to baseline or were improved for the majority of patients who received PDA-001, which hints at a potential reparative effect in this disease. No patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity and no clinically significant safety signals were observed. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and included headache, nausea, and infusion site reactions.
Other cell therapies, including bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells, have been explored from a safety perspective in patients with MS (Connick et al, 2012, Karussis et al, 2010, Liang et al, 2009, and Mohyeddin Bonab et al, 2007). Consistent with these studies, the findings of the current study indicate that infusion of mesenchymal-like cells to patients with MS is feasible and safe. To our knowledge, this phase 1b randomized controlled study is the first to explore clinical effect of placenta-derived mesenchymal-like cell therapy in patients with MS. A recent proof-of-concept phase 2 study with autologous bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell infusion in patients with SPMS reported evidence of improvements in some disease-related end points, which was suggestive of neuroprotection ( Connick et al., 2012 ). Relative to cell therapies derived from other tissue sources, PDA-001 may have significant benefits from a novel therapeutic development standpoint, including derivation from a safe and plentiful source of non-embryonic cells (full-term placenta) and production scalability comparable to traditional pharmaceuticals.
4.3. Study strengths and limitations
The precise mechanism by which PDA-001 might act in MS is not known. In the murine EAE model of MS, there is evidence that the therapeutic effect is mediated by both peripheral and central actions (Fisher-Shoval et al, 2012 and Morando et al, 2012). PDA-001 modulates immune function in EAE, as well as several other preclinical models of disease ( Liu et al., 2014 ). Collectively, these data provide a scientific rationale for study of PDA-001 in MS and other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The development program includes assessment in inflammatory diseases, such as Crohn׳s disease and arthritis ( Mayer et al., 2013 ). Early phase testing of a disease-modifying reparative strategy for neural damage, as in the immune suppression/reparative strategy for MS, is particularly novel and intriguing. In addition, the potential to repair non-inflammatory neural destruction associated with stroke is being explored (Chen et al, 2013 and Shehadah et al, 2014). In the overall PDA-001 development program to date (early studies in all indications), the most common adverse events include headache (29 [26%] of 112 patients), pyrexia (25 [22%] of 112 patients), and nausea (21 [19%] of 112 patients).
The small size of the study precludes any statement about the efficacy of PDA-001 in slowing or reversing the development of disability in these patients. In addition, there was an imbalance in the representation of RRMS and SPMS between the 2 dosing cohorts. The impact of this on our study is unclear; SPMS patients may be less likely to develop new gadolinium enhancing lesions than RRMS patients. However, patient 007-2006, who had the greatest number of new lesions, was an SPMS patient.
PDA-001 infusion appears to be safe and well tolerated in patients with MS, and no paradoxical worsening of MS lesion counts was noted in either dose group. Given that no significant negative safety signal was identified, a proof-of-concept study is planned to further evaluate the dose and dosing regimen in patients with RRMS and SPMS.
Dr Lublin and Dr Fischkoff had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition of data: All authors.
Analysis and interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Fischkoff.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Lublin, Fischkoff.
Statistical analysis: Fischkoff, Lublin.
Study supervision: Fischkoff.
Conflicts of interest
Drs Lubin, Bowen, Huddlestone, Kremenchutzky, Carpenter, Corboy, Freedman, and Krupp have received grant support from Celgene Corporation. Drs Lublin, Corboy, and Freedman have served as remunerated members of a Celgene advisory committee. Ms Paulo, Dr Hariri, and Dr Fischkoff are full-time employees of Celgene Corporation with stock and stock options.
Role of the funding source
The sponsor was jointly responsible for the study design, along with the other authors. It was also responsible for the study execution, and the data collection and analysis. It was jointly responsible for the writing of the report and the decision to publish this manuscript along with the other authors.
This study was supported by Celgene Cellular Therapeutics, Warren, NJ. The authors received editorial support in the preparation of this report from Christine H. Blood, PhD, of Peloton Advantage, funded by Celgene Cellular Therapeutics. The authors, however, directed and are fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions for this report.
- Bradley, 2008 W. Bradley. Neurology in clinical practice 5th ed. (Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, 2008)
- Chen et al., 2013 J Chen, A Shehadah, A Pal, A Zacharek, X Cui, Y Cui, et al. Neuroprotective effect of human placenta-derived cell treatment of stroke in rats. Cell Transplant. 2013;22:871-879
- Compston and Coles, 2008 A Compston, A. Coles. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372:1502-1517 Crossref
- Connick et al., 2012 P Connick, M Kolappan, C Crawley, DJ Webber, R Patani, AW Michell, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label phase 2a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:150-156 Crossref
- Darlington et al., 2011 PJ Darlington, MN Boivin, A. Bar-Or. Harnessing the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11:1295-1303 Crossref
- Fisher-Shoval et al., 2012 Y Fisher-Shoval, Y Barhum, O Sadan, S Yust-Katz, T Ben-Zur, N Lev, et al. Transplantation of placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the EAE mouse model of MS. J Mol Neurosci. 2012;48:176-184 Crossref
- He et al., 2013 S He, J Khan, J Gleason, E Eliav, E Fik-Rymarkiewicz, U Herzberg, et al. Placenta-derived adherent cells attenuate hyperalgesia and neuroinflammatory response associated with perineural inflammation in rats. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;27:185-192 Crossref
- Karussis et al., 2010 D Karussis, C Karageorgiou, A Vaknin-Dembinsky, B Gowda-Kurkalli, JM Gomori, I Kassis, et al. Safety and immunological effects of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:1187-1194
- Keough and Yong, 2013 MB Keough, VW. Yong. Remyelination therapy for multiple sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2013;10:44-54 Crossref
- Liang et al., 2009 J Liang, H Zhang, B Hua, H Wang, J Wang, Z Han, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in treatment of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2009;15:644-646 Crossref
- Liu et al., 2014 W Liu, A Morschauser, X. Zhang. Human placenta-derived adherent cells induce tolerogenic immune responses. Clin Transl Immunol. 2014;3:e14 10.1038/cti.2014.5 Crossref
- Lublin and Reingold, 1996 FD Lublin, SC. Reingold. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 1996;46:907-911 Crossref
- Martino et al., 2010 G Martino, RJ Franklin, A Baron Van Evercooren, DA. Kerr. Stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: current status and future prospects. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:247-255 Crossref
- Mayer et al., 2013 L Mayer, WM Pandak, GY Melmed, SB Hanauer, K Johnson, D Payne, et al. Safety and tolerability of human placenta-derived cells (PDA001) in treatment-resistant crohn׳s disease: a phase 1 study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:754-760 Crossref
- Mohyeddin Bonab et al., 2007 M Mohyeddin Bonab, S Yazdanbakhsh, J Lotfi, K Alimoghaddom, F Talebian, F Hooshmand, et al. Does mesenchymal stem cell therapy help multiple sclerosis patients? Report of a pilot study. Iran J Immunol. 2007;4:50-57
- Morando et al., 2012 S Morando, T Vigo, M Esposito, S Casazza, G Novi, MC Principato, et al. The therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is mediated by peripheral and central mechanisms. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;3:3 Crossref
- Nauta and Fibbe, 2007 AJ Nauta, WE. Fibbe. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood. 2007;110:3499-3506 Crossref
- Polman et al., 2005 CH Polman, SC Reingold, G Edan, M Filippi, HP Hartung, L Kappos, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria“. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:840-846 Crossref
- Pugliatti et al., 2006 M Pugliatti, G Rosati, H Carton, T Riise, J Drulovic, L Vecsei, et al. The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:700-722 Crossref
- Riddell et al., 2011 CA Riddell, Y Zhao, DK Li, AJ Petkau, A Riddehough, GR Cutter, et al. Evaluation of safety monitoring guidelines based on MRI lesion activity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011;77:2089-2096 Crossref
- Rosati, 2001 G. Rosati. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: an update. Neurol Sci. 2001;22:117-139 Crossref
- Shehadah et al., 2014 A Shehadah, J Chen, A Pal, S He, A Zeitlin, X Cui, et al. Human placenta-derived adherent cell treatment of experimental stroke promotes functional recovery after stroke in young adult and older rats. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86621 Crossref
- Uccelli et al., 2011 A Uccelli, A Laroni, MS. Freedman. Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and other neurological diseases. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:649-656 Crossref
a Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th Street, Box 1138, New York, NY 10029, United States
b Swedish Neuroscience Institute, 1600 East Jefferson, Suite 205, Seattle, WA 98122, United States
c MultiCare Health System-Neuroscience Center of Washington, 915 6th Avenue, Suite 101 and 200, Tacoma, WA 98405, United States
d London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, 7th Floor, 339 Windermere Road, PO Box 5339, London, ON, Canada N6A 5A5
e University of Minnesota, Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, 717 Delaware Street SE, Suite 246, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States
f University of Colorado Denver, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop B185, Room 5506, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
g The Ottawa Hospital Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, 501 Smyth Road, Box 607, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6
h MS Comprehensive Care Center, MSC T12-020 SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States
i Celgene Cellular Therapeutics, 7 Powderhorn Road, Warren, NJ 07059, United States
☆ Presented at the 28th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, October 10–13, 2012, Lyon, France.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.