Multiple Sclerosis Resource Centre

Welcome to the Multiple Sclerosis Resource Centre. This website is intended for international healthcare professionals with an interest in Multiple Sclerosis. By clicking the link below you are declaring and confirming that you are a healthcare professional

You are here

Abnormally high levels of anti-collagen type IV IgG antibodies in the serum of patients with a clinically isolated syndrome correlate with an increased risk of conversion to MS

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, pages 30 - 33



  • Raised serum anti-collagen antibodies appear in more than half of patients with CIS.
  • IgM anti-collagen antibodies have no prognostic value regarding conversion to MS.
  • IgG anti-collagen antibodies correlate with increased risk of conversion to MS.



To investigate anti-collagen-type-IV serum antibodies (ACIVAbs) levels in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), and to determine their predictive value for conversion into multiple sclerosis (MS).

Material and Methods

Serum levels of IgM and IgG ACIVAbs in 40 untreated patients with CIS (13 male, mean age 34.85 ± 11.4 years, range 16–58 years) were compared to those of 27 gender- and age-matched healthy controls. ACIVAbs were quantified using ELISA. Patients were followed for 5 years by clinical examination and MRI studies.


Thirty two patients (80%) converted to MS (converted CIS, C-CIS group) while the rest 8 (20%) did not (non-converted CIS, NC-CIS). The C-CIS patients had significantly higher levels of IgG ACIVAb compared to NC-CIS while the IgM levels did not differ between C-CIS and NC-CIS. Conversion to MS occurred in 66% of patients with IgG ACIVAbs levels exceeding the 95th percentile found in controls. IgG ACIVAbs levels correlated positively with the serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases type 9 (r = 0.37;p = 0.003) and inversely with those of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases type 1 (r = −0.43;p = 0.0008).


High serum levels of IgG ACIVAbs in patients with CIS correlate strongly with increased risk of conversion to MS.

Keywords: Multiple sclerosis, Clinically isolated syndrome, Matrix metalloproteinases, Metalloproteinases inhibitor, Anti-collagen type IV antibodies.

1. Introduction

Predicting the risk of conversion of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) into definitive multiple sclerosis (MS) is important in patient management[1], [2], and [3]. While advances in imaging have contributed to define early treatment strategies, the approach in many cases remains debatable[4], [5], and [6]. Autoimmune inflammation is cardinal in MS pathogenesis, and therefore, a search for immunological markers for the presence and activity of disease had begun long ago and still continues.

The results concerning the predictive value of individual autoantibodies studied are not very encouraging at this stage[6], [7], [8], and [9]. The presence of IgG oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid is a well established and important predictive factor for conversion[4] and [10], but the role of autoantibodies against synthesized N-glycosylated peptides [11] , anti-alpha-glucose-based glycan [12] , myelin basic protein, and myelin oligodendrocyte protein [13] , remains inconclusive.

Collagen type IV is a principal constituent of brain–blood barrier and inflammatory disruption of the blood–brain barrier is a major mechanism in MS [1] . We, therefore, decided to assess the levels of anti-collagen-type-IV serum antibodies (ACIVAbs) in patients with CIS and to determine their predictive value for conversion into MS. We also compared the ACIVAbs levels with some established immunological markers of inflammation, namely the proinflammatory serum metalloproteinase type 9 and the anti-inflammatory tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases type 1.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Patients

The study was carried out at a University Hospital and a specialized medical practice. The hospital is the tertiary care center for a referral population of over 800,000 inhabitants. Primary and secondary care providers were encouraged to refer patients with CIS for participation in this study. Patients were recruited between January 1 and December 31, 2008. Forty patients, diagnosed with CIS according to McDonalds criteria 2005 gave informed consent to participate in the study. They included 27 females and 13 males, of mean age 34.85 ± 11.4 years old (range 16–58). Twenty-seven age- and sex-matched healthy controls also volunteered for this study. Patients were followed over 5 years by phone interviews, detailed history, and clinical examination, at least one time every 6 months. They were instructed to contact the investigators if any events, suspicious of relapse, occurred.

MRI with contrast was performed at baseline and every 6 months during the follow-up period.

The clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1 .

Table 1 Clinical and MRI characteristic of patients at baseline.

  C-CIS (n = 32) NC-CIS (n = 8) P
Mean age 39.5 ± 8.33 32.5± 8.4 0.04
Male - n (%) 13 (40.6) 3 (37.5) NS
Initial symptoms

Motor symptoms

12 (37.5)

1 (12.5)

Sensory symptoms 5 (15.63) 2 (25.0) NS
Brain-stem symptoms 3 (9.38) 2 (25.0) NS
Cerebellar symptoms 2 (6.25) 0 (0.0)
Visual symptoms 6 (18.75) 3 (37.5) NS
Afferent (sensory + visual) 2 (6.25) 0 (0.0)
Efferent (motor + cerebellar) 2 (6.25) 0 (0.0)
EDSS during first episode (at nadir) 3.1 ± 0.2 (2.5–4.0) 2.1 ± 0.18 (2.0–2.5) <0.001†
EDSS at 5 years


МRI 1–2 criteria of Barkhof

МRI 3–4 criteria of Barkhof
3.0 ± 1.3


24 (75)

8 (25)
0.25 ± 0.46


6 (80)

0 (0.0)

Number of initial МRI lesions > 9 26 (81.25) 1 (12.5) 0.0002†
Number of initial МRI lesions < 9 6 (8.75) 7 (87.5) 0.0002†
Gadolinium-enhancing МRI lesions 5 (63.6) 0 (0.0) 0.001†

C-CIS=(clinically isolated syndrome converted to MS); NC-CIS=(clinically isolated syndrome not converted to MS); ЕDSS=Kurtzke scale of disability;n=number;P=level of significance; NS=non-significant difference; † Kruskal–Wallis test for distribution different from normal.

2.2. Immunological Methods

Sera from patients were collected within 12 weeks (median 5 weeks, range 1–12) after the onset of symptoms. At that time they were untreated by steroids or disease-modifying therapies.

  • Indirect ELISA for testing anti-collagen type IV antibodies of IgG and IgМ class in human serum.Microtiter plates (Microlon U-bottom, high binding, Greiner Bio One, Frickenhausen Germany) were sensitized respectively by human placental collagen type IV (Sigma) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml in carbonate buffer pH 9.6, of 100 μl per well. After incubation for 2 h at 37 °C and overnight at 4 °C, the wells were blocked with 0.1% bovine serum albumin and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The tested serums diluted 1:40 in PBS–Tween, were dropped in 100 μl per well and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. That was followed by staining with drops of anti-human IgG or IgM peroxidase conjugate (Sigma) in dilution 1:16 000, and 1:20 000 respectively and incubation for 1 h at 37 °C. As a colorimetric substrate it was 0.8 μg/ml O-phenylenediamine (Sigma), dissolved in 0.05 M citrate buffer (pH 5.0) with 0.01% of Н2О2. The wells were washed three times with PBS–Tween 20, after each stage of testing. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 μl 8 NH2SO4and the absorbance was measured on an automated MicroELISA Reader, at a wavelength of 490 nm. The following controls were used: (1) a substrate-control: in sensitized wells with collagen it was added only as buffer for sample dissolution, and colorimetric substrate; (2) conjugate control: peroxidase-conjugated antibody was added directly to the wells sensitized with an antigen; (3) negative control to assess the specificity of the reaction: the antigen was replaced with solution of human serum albumin; (4) positive control: the tested sera were replaced with anti-α-elastin or anti-collagen type IV polyclonal antibodies (Elastin Product Company, USA), diluted 1:2000 in buffer sera. All sera were tested three times and the mean value ± SE was calculated. In cases other than the normal distribution, the median values and 95 percentile (Р95) were used.
  • For recording MMP-9 and TIMP-1 concentrationit used a kit based on the principle of the sandwich ELISA (R&D systems, cat. No. DMP900, DTM100). According to the manufacturer's instructions, in each well of the plates 50 μl tested serum was dropped, diluted 1:100 with calibrator diluent or standard in different concentration doses for the construction of a standard straight line. After 2 h at room temperature and agitation on a shaker, the plates were washed three times with 300 μl washing buffer per well. After the last wash, 200 μl anti-MMP-9 or anti-TIMP-1 antibody conjugated with peroxidase are added, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature on a shaker. They were washed again and 200 μl of substrate solution was added to each well. That was incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The reaction was stopped with 50 μl stop solution and the extinction was measured on an automated ELISA reader (“Ceres UV900C”—Bio-Tek Instruments Inc.) at 450 nm. From each tested serum or standard for all testing it was dropped in three wells and the arithmetic mean of extinction was determined. The concentrations of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 were calculated for each tested serum by a formula derived from the standard line that was constructed, based on the extinctions of the standards at different concentrations.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The data from the study were presented as mean values (X) ± standard error of the mean (SE). The differences between the test groups were analyzed with ANOVA, as post hoc analysis by the method of the least significant difference (LSD) was made in the case of statistically significant differences and parametric distribution of the data. In nonparametric distribution, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used. The correlations between the studied parameters were evaluated by the Pearson method. For all tests, a significance level ofp < 0.05 was accepted. SPSS program for Windows–version 1.5 was used for the statistical data processing.

3. Results

During the observation period, 32 patients (80%, confidence interval 67.6–92.4% atp = 0.95) converted to MS. They represent the C-CIS cohort. The rest 8 patients (20%, confidence interval 7.6–32.4%) remained clinically stable, without any new symptoms or signs, or MRI activity. They form the NC-CIS cohort.

The levels of IgM and IgG ACIVAbs in the serum in C-CIS, NC-CIS, and the control group were compared ( Fig. 1 ). C–CIS patients had higher IgG ACIVAbs levels compared to NC-CIS (p = 0.041), while IgM levels did not differ significantly between C-CIS and NC–CIS cohorts (p = 0.44). The controls had significantly lower levels of both classes of antibodies, at a very high statistical level of significance (p < 0.0005).


Fig. 1 Comparison of ACIVAb IgG serum levels in C–CIS (clinically isolated syndrome converted to MS), NC–CIS (clinically isolated syndrome non-converted to MS) and controls.

The prospective follow-up for 5 years ( Table 2 ) showed that about 66% of patients with IgG ACIVAbs exceeding the 95th percentile established in controls converted to MS.

Table 2 Conversion to MS according to ACIVAb baseline serum levels.

Serum levels C-CIS (n = 32) NC-CIS (n = 8) Controls (n = 27)
ACIVAb IgM      
<95th Percentile 56.3% (18 patients) 37.5% (3 patients) 92.6% (25 persons)
>95th Percentile 43.7% (14 patients) 62.5% (5 patients) 7.4% (2 persons)
ACIVAb IgG      
<95th percentile 34.4% (11 patients) 75.0% (6 patients) 96.3% (26 persons)
>95th percentile 65.6% (21 patients) 25.0% (2 patients) 3.7% (1 person)

АCIVAb IgG, ACIVAb IgM=(anti-collagen type IV antibodies of IgG and IgM class); C-CIS=(clinically isolated syndrome converted to MS); NC-CIS=(clinically isolated syndrome non converted to MS); no statistical difference between C-CIS and NC-CIS for IgM (p = 0.44); significant difference between C-CIS and NC-CIS for IgG (p = 0.041; Fisher exact probability test).

IgG ACIVAbs levels correlated positively to the activity of metalloproteinases type 9 (r = 0.37;p = 0.003) and negatively with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases type 1 (r = −0.43;p = 0.0008).

The antibody changes were independent of gender, age, multifocal neurological symptoms, EDSS, number of MRI lesions, and baseline MMP type 2 (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

This pilot study established that abnormally high levels of serum IgM and IgG ACIVAbs appear during a first demyelinating episode in more than half of the patients. However, the acute phase IgM is increased in both C-CIS and NC-CIS groups and has no prognostic value regarding conversion. On the contrary, IgG ACIVAbs correlate with increased risk of conversion to MS and are significantly more frequent in C-CIS patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the subject.

Collagen type IV together with proteoglycans and glycoproteins is a major component of basal membranes of almost all tissues [14] . This fibrillary protein may be defragmented due to various pathological processes, and the products of its destruction like collagen type IV degradation peptides (CIVDP) appear in the serum[15] and [16]. In some cases, the destruction is caused by anti-collagen autoantibodies directed against antigenic determinants of the intact collagen[17], [18], and [19], as observed in certain autoimmune diseases[20], [21], and [22]. In another scenario, the synthesis of antibodies is an epiphenomenon, following initial collagen destruction through other mechanisms and release of immunogenic CIVDP. In recent years, it was found that serum levels of IgG ACIVAbs correlate positively with the development of microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy[23] and [24], and polyneuropathy [25] . Some antigenic determinants provoking humoral response to collagen type IV have been identified [26] .

Autoimmune process in MS is considered to start in the peripheral lymph tissues, and then the pathological process is transferred in the central nervous system[4], [27], and [28]. The immune cells penetrate through blood–brain barrier releasing matrix metalloproteinases [29] , among which collagenase plays an important role, causing collagen fragmentation and the appearance of CIVDP in the serum. They are a powerful stimulus for synthesis of anti-collagen antibodies [30] , which in turn may further destroy collagen fibers and deteriorate blood–brain barrier function.

Our results demonstrate the presence of elevated IgM and IgG anti-collagen antibodies in patients with CIS. They most likely reflect the mechanism described above (as an epiphenomenon following the release of CIVDP after destruction of the blood–brain barrier). This conjecture is confirmed by the positive correlation with metalloproteinases type 9 levels and the inverse one with their tissue inhibitor. The IgM are equally distributed among C-CIS and NC-CIS patients and correspond to the transient acute phase response. The elevated IgG titers in patients prone to convert to MS but not in NC-CIS may indicate a tendency for chronic inflammation and further reactivation.

One disadvantage of this study is the relatively small number of patients. Another shortcoming is that the majority of our patients had multifocal CIS with multiple demyelinating lesions; they belong to a group with higher risk for conversion to MS and might be not entirely representative of the general CIS patient population. We do not have an explanation for this clustering of patients; closest to mind is some referral bias, whereby persons with mildest presentations were not referred by the primary or secondary care levels. On the other hand, involving the patients with highest risk of conversion focuses the study on a cohort of particular interest. Indeed, nowadays many of our patients with multifocal CIS would be started on treatment. At the time, in 2008, the National Guidelines in the country of origin did not support such an approach.

We see the strengths of our study in its prospective nature, the relatively long observation period, high level of compliance (we did not lose a single patient from follow up). We also followed strictly internationally accepted criteria in their modifications [8] . Finally, the statistical levels of significance show quite strong trends, implying clinical significance to the statistical as well.

Aside from the possible implications regarding MS pathogenesis, our findings, if replicated and confirmed in larger patient cohorts, might have therapeutic significance, providing a marker of continuing CNS inflammation in patients with CIS and an additional criterion for starting disease-modifying treatment. However, to this end we should provide for specificity of the marker, either by looking for ACIVAbs in the CSF or by combining it with other serum markers of blood–brain barrier disruption.

In conclusion, patients with CIS who later convert to MS have abnormally high levels of IgG ACIVAbs. These antibodies deserve further study as possible biomarkers predicting disease progression in CIS, in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) and in MS with different disease course.


  • [1] D.H. Miller, F. Barkhof, X. Montalban, A. Thompson. Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of MS: part 1 natural history, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:281-288 Crossref
  • [2] A. Garcia-Merino, M. Blasco. Confirming the MS diagnosis. Int MS J. 2007;14:58-63
  • [3] M. Hutchinson. Predicting and preventing the future: active managing multiple sclerosis. Pract Neurol. 2009;9:133-143 Crossref
  • [4] D.H. Miller, D.T. Chard, O. Cicarelli. Clinically isolated syndromes review. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:157-169 Crossref
  • [5] R.F. Bunyan, J.S. Pittock. Do not treat from CIS onset: evaluate disease course and prognosis first-yes. Mult Scler J. 2012;18:391-393 Crossref
  • [6] M. Freedman. Do not treat from CIS onset: evaluate disease course and prognosis first-No (treat!). Mult Scler J. 2012;18:394-395 Crossref
  • [7] B. Bielekova, R. Martin. Development of biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2004;127:1463-1478 Crossref
  • [8] C.H. Polman, S.C. Reingold, B. Banwell, M. Clanet, J.A. Cohen, M. Filippi, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revision to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:292-302 Crossref
  • [9] J. Kuhle, C. Pohl, M. Mehling, G. Edan, M. Freedman, H. Hartung, et al. Lack of association between antimyelin antibodies and progression to multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:371-378 Crossref
  • [10] J.L. Bennett, K. Haubold, A.M. Ritchie, S.J. Edwards, M. Burgoon, A.J. Shearer, et al. CSF IgG heavy-chain bias in patients at the time of clinically isolated syndrome. J Neuroimmunol. 2008;199:126-132 Crossref
  • [11] F. Lolli, B. Lolli, A. Carotenuto. An N-glucosylated peptide detecting disease-specific autoantibodies, biomarkers of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:10273-10278 Crossref
  • [12] M. Freedman, J. Laks, N. Dotan, R. Altstock, A. Dukler. Anti-alpha–glucose-based glycan IgM antibodies predict relapse activity in multiple sclerosis after the first neurological event. Mult Scler. 2009;15:422-430 Crossref
  • [13] T. Berger, P. Rubner, F. Schautzer. Antimyelin antibodies as a predictor of clinically definite multiple sclerosis after a first demyelinating event. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:139-145 Crossref
  • [14] G. Fauri. Function structural relationship of elastic arteries in evolution: from microfibrils to elastin and elastic fibers. Pathol Biol. 2001;49(4):310-325
  • [15] G. Nicoloff, S. Baydanoff, N. Stanimirova. Serum collagen type IV in healthy children and children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin Appl Immunol Invest. 2001;1:165-168
  • [16] L. Risteli, J. Risteli. Analysis of extracellular matrix proteins in biological fluids. Methods Enzymol. 1987;145:391-411 Crossref
  • [17] T. Susumu, T. Uchugu, T. Shoichi. Measurement of serum anti-type IV collagen antibody in diabetic patients. Annals of Gunma University School of Health Sciences. 2003;24:87-91
  • [18] T. Menge, P.H. Lalive, H.C. von Budingen, B. Cree, S.L. Hauser, C.P. Genain. Antibody responses against galactocerebroside is potential stage-specific biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:453-459 Crossref
  • [19] C.L. Yang, J. Brinckmann, F. Rui, K. Vehring. Autoantibodies to cartilage collagens in relapsing polychondritis. Arch Dermatol Res. 1993;285(5):245-249 Crossref
  • [20] L. Moreland, R. Gay, S. Gay. Collagen autoantibodies in patients with vasculitis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Immunnopathol. 1991;60(3):412-418 Crossref
  • [21] B. Gyorgy, L. Tothfalusi, G. Nagy. Natural auto antibodies reactive with glycosaminoglycans in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:R10
  • [22] K. Colburn, E. Langa-Shariffi, G. Kely, M. Malto, L. Sandberg, S. Baydanoff, et al. Abnormalities of serum anti-elastin antibodies in connective tissue disease. J Investig Med. 2003;51(2):104-109 Crossref
  • [23] G. Nicoloff, S. Baydanoff, Petrova Ch, P. Christova. Serum antibodies to collagen type IV and development of diabetic vascular complications in children with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. A longitudinal study. Vascul Pharmacol. 2002;38(3):143-147 Crossref
  • [24] G. Nicoloff, S. Baydanoff, N. Stanimirova, C. Petrova, P. Christova. Detection of serum collagen type IV in children with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus—a longitudinal study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2001;2(4):184-190 Crossref
  • [25] G. Nicoloff, D. Valcova, S. Baydanoff. Specificity and age-related changes of antibodies to collagen type I in normal human sera. Autoimmunity. 1994;17(3):257-258 Crossref
  • [26] P.M. Mahieu, P.H. Lambert, G.R. Maghuin-Rogister. Primary structure of a small glycopeptide isolated from human glomerular basement membrane and carrying a major antigenic site. Eur J Biochem. 1973;40:599-606 Crossref
  • [27] L. Steinman. Multiple sclerosis: a two-stage disease. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:762-764 Crossref
  • [28] T. Chitnis. The role of CD4T cells in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2007;79:43-72 Crossref
  • [29] G. Rozenberg. Matrix metalloproteinases and neuroinflamation in multiple sclerosis. Neuroscience. 2002;8:586-593
  • [30] J. Van Horssen, L. Bö, C.D. Dijkstra, H.E. de Vries. Extensive extracellular matrix depositions in active multiple sclerosis lesions. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;24:484-491 Crossref


a Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Pleven, Georgi Kochev st 8A, Pleven 5800, Bulgaria

b Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Sandringham level 1, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospital of Leicester, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK

c Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK

d Department of Neurology, Ibn-Sina Hospital, Kuwait, POB 25427, Safat 13115, Kuwait

e National Hospital in Cardiology, Neurology Clinic, 65 Konjovitsa Str., Sofia 1309, Bulgaria

f Department of Biology, Medical University of Pleven, Kliment Ohridski St. 1, Pleven 5800, Bulgaria

g Department of Psychology, Affiliate “Prof Ivan Mitev” of Vratza, Medical University of Sofia, School Complex 1, Vratza 3000, Bulgaria

h Department of Clinical Laboratory, University Hospital of Pleven, Georgi Kochev St. 8A, Pleven 5800, Bulgaria

lowast Corresponding author. Tel.: +359 64 80 22 46; fax: +359 64 80 22 46.

Search this site

Stay up-to-date with our monthly e-alert

If you want to regularly receive information on what is happening in MS research sign up to our e-alert.

Subscribe »

About the Editors

  • Prof Timothy Vartanian

    Timothy Vartanian, Professor at the Brain and Mind Research Institute and the Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell...
  • Dr Claire S. Riley

    Claire S. Riley, MD is an assistant attending neurologist and assistant professor of neurology in the Neurological Institute, Columbia University,...
  • Dr Rebecca Farber

    Rebecca Farber, MD is an attending neurologist and assistant professor of neurology at the Neurological Institute, Columbia University, in New...

This online Resource Centre has been made possible by a donation from EMD Serono, Inc., a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Note that EMD Serono, Inc., has no editorial control or influence over the content of this Resource Centre. The Resource Centre and all content therein are subject to an independent editorial review.

The Grant for Multiple Sclerosis Innovation
supports promising translational research projects by academic researchers to improve understanding of multiple sclerosis (MS) for the ultimate benefit of patients.  For full information and application details, please click here

Journal Editor's choice

Recommended by Prof. Brenda Banwell

Causes of death among persons with multiple sclerosis

Gary R. Cutter, Jeffrey Zimmerman, Amber R. Salter, et al.

Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, September 2015, Vol 4 Issue 5